- October 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- October 2007
Monthly Archives: September 2011
Hello Fellow Toastmasters!
What a phenomenal and exciting night we had at First Oakville last night! Between both the Table Topics and Humourous Contests, we had 21 separate instances of self-challenge and friendly competition.
First of all, congratulations to all of our winners!
First Place Peter West
Second Place Matt Wagner
Third Place Marion West
First Place David Locke
Second Place Heather Cunningham
Third Place Deborah Bartucci
Also, congratulations to each and every contestant.
It was especially wonderful to see some of our newest Toastmasters competing in one or both contests (Dennis MacDonald and Cam McDougall come to mind).
It was also refreshing to have a few members decide last minute to participate and encouraging that they felt comfortable enough to do so.
The audience was riveted to hear 12 different responses to the Table Topics theme, which was ‘Attitude’. Each variation on the topic actually revealed a deeper insight into the minds of our beloved Toastmasters.
All I can say about our Humorous Contest is that I have never laughed so much at a contest! The subject matters ranged from ‘Montezuma’s Revenge’ to the marketing of wine to death and insurance. If you missed the contest last night, please be sure to check out the videos posted.
I offer a special thanks to all behind the scenes that supported the contests either as chief judge, judge, counter or timekeeper. This was tricky to manage since we had so many participants. The offer of assistance with little notice and the amount of flexibility was greatly appreciated.
Our next contests will be in late January ~ the International Speech Contest and the Evaluation Contest. It is not too early to begin planning that award winning International Speech or honing your evaluation skills!
Furthermore, take a look at your Competent Leadership Manual for requirements such as serving as a Chairman or Chief Judge.
Finally, Peter and David will compete at the Area Contest on Thursday, October 6 here at First Oakville!
Please come out and support our winners! Second place winners be ready and waiting since you will be on-call in case our first place winner cannot attend.
First Oakville Toastmasters
Well, we’ve had two meetings already and I’m finally getting down to writing my first blog post I really wanted to get out two weeks ago!
Time flies at Toastmasters!
The new executive held two lively meetings prior to the kick off of the new season, I’d like to thank the membership for selecting a fabulous team of individuals to help me guide the club through the new season. We’e got lots of ideas, some of which you may have heard already.
As I mentioned during our first meeting, we want to protect the wonderful culture we have at First Oakville and our focus will be around the “Four F’s” – keeping the club:
- Focused (on development of all members)
- Functional (well organized and well planned)
- Feedback (we want to know what you want and what we can do better)
One of the most gratifying experiences for me so far has been to see so many members return for another season. While always disappointing to see anyone move on, we only lost five members this year and I think three of those were due to relocation to other parts of the GTA.
Guest turnout has been high at both meetings and I believe we could achieve a Smedley Award this year by attracting five new members before the end of the month. This will win us a free new banner with the new TMI logo to hang all our ribbons on!
We’ve already received lots of valuable feedback from the survey our VP Education sent out and a couple of observations are worth commenting on.
First, it’s clear the workshops we held last season were very popular and there is a high level of interest to continue with these, we hear you, stay tuned!
Secondly, for many of you, keeping meetings on time is important and I want to assure you the executive is sensitive to this, however, I ask you to keep in mind that we are a large club and we are all there to learn, keeping roles and speeches to the allocated time is part of the learning experience and as such, we won’t be perfect.
Some speeches are also longer that the typical 5-7 minutes, and there is no way the VP Ed knows this when the schedule is put together and if you do the math, if we run with four speakers on a night, it’s almost impossible to finish at 9:30pm. So with the structure of our meetings, there will be times we run over.
Finally, as your president, I hope you all have a wonderful 2011-2012 season at First Oakville, come out to as many meetings as you can possibly make and make sure you get up and speak at least once!
And don’t forget your manuals!
It was an interesting meeting with an address by the area governor and an induction of new members plus the new business session and three speakers and we ended pretty close to on time.
Some members are going to have to remember that dinner meetings start early and it’s a worthy challenge to arrive on time. Coming in late is disruptive.
There were several opportunities where speakers could have been much more concise and we should look at those opportunities in the future.
In addition to inducting the executive, the area governor talked about the new branding of Toastmasters from the International headquarters which was influenced by the organization’s growth in Asian countries and thus the reduction of English from the brand.
In private the area governor mused out loud that it might be time to form another club in the Oakville/Burlington area. With First Oakville likely to hit 50 members before Christmas and I’m thinking 60 by year’s end we’ve got to do something.
Having this many members makes for a dynamic and exciting Toastmaster club but it limits the opportunities for members to speak and participate.
And of course what would a visit from the area governor be without a pitch for the fall conference which is coming to London, Ontario on the weekend of Nov. 25. For $220, which includes meals, it’s a pretty good deal and a fun weekend away.
(In photo: Left to right – Toastmasters Eleanor Hayward (Secretary), Elaine Collins (VP of Public Relations), Area Governor Carol Todd-Skuce, Glenn Marshall (Sgt.-At-Arms), Linda Rossi (VP of Education), David Webster (President), Heather Cunningham (VP of Membership) and Tyler Bayley (Treasurer).
If you were a speaker or an evaluator at a First Oakville Toastmaster meeting then you’ve got a video of yourself waiting in the club’s DropBox folder.
To get a DropBox folder link you must be on the club’s membership list and have requested a link.
All speakers with videos in DropBox are invited to drag their folder out of DropBox. This will remove the file from the master folder and it will thus be gone and unavailable to anyone else.
All evaluators share the same video file and thus should make a copy of the file and drag the copy out of DropBox and onto their computer.
All files are erased prior to the next batch of files being loaded.
DropBox is a secure, private (FTP) file sharing system and has worked well for the club.
Two articles in the weekend newspapers gets me thinking on this topic Sunday morning.
Article one is from Saturday’s Globe and Mail. It’s an essay by Michael Ignatieff (yes that Michael Ignatieff) about a government’s right to rule.
In it, he says, that one of the tasks of government and perhaps the first task, is to protect, to defend and to secure.
Any government that does not, loses their legitimacy, their capacity and their competence.
Mr. Ignatieff then lists the failures of the American government which include 911, weapons of mass destruction, Iraq, Afghanistan, Katrina, New Orleans, the economic crisis, the mortgage bubble, the Gulf of Mexico wellhead burst and the US national debt.
He says that when you look at this list of government failures there’s no surprise that the American people have grown cynical of government.
The second article, from the Sunday New York Times, is about a woman in India who has been on a hunger strike to protest government policy!
The 39-year-old poet and activist was returned to her hospital bed to be feed by a court-ordered feeding tube after she refused to drop her hunger strike.
And what is she protesting? Her cause is to get India to remove the laws that shield security forces from prosecution.
And she has held to this protest for 11 years.
So what’s this got to do with Toastmasters?
Here’s another illustration that might help to set the stage.
Another national organization of which I was an executive member until I resigned last year (somewhat in protest as I could no longer in good faith support the decisions being made or not made by the leaders of the organization) is facing total collapse as the membership falls and few, if any, seem inclined to put their names forward for office.
Why has this happened? IMHO it’s because the leaders of the organization ran the national association like a private business. Decisions were made that served the organization but didn’t serve the members and now the members are voting with their feet.
This is a failure of governance. The executive team lost its legitimacy to govern and the members are not supporting them and the organization is going to fail.
So back to Toastmasters.
We can take these lessons right down to the club level and apply them to individual meetings.
Our club executives are elected to serve and not govern.
Executive teams that understand this principle thrive even in difficult times. Why? Because they have the support of the members of the club behind them. And while there maybe differences of opinion, which is healthy, there is no descent or protest that results and the members will rush to the defence of its executive group and support their decisions if subject to outside attack.
Even the chairperson of the night is wise to remember that their agenda does not represent the sovereign will of the assembly. The agenda is merely a guide to what might happen during the night. The actual power to change the agenda rests with the assembly.
And it is the responsibility of every member to be ever vigilant and ready to protest whenever they think the will of the assembly is not being served.
Thankfully in Toastmasters we do not have to go on 11-year hunger strikes.
It is absolutely essentially and our duty as members that we remember that our leaders (whether they be the chair for evening, the executive team or our national leaders) are fallible and need our help and support. We can help support them by being vigilant and willing to share our thoughts with the greater assembly every time we think we can be helpful.
In Toastmasters we find how to do this in Robert’s Rules of Order.
Every member should be aware of what is happening during the meeting.
If for any reason you are not certain of what to do, you are allowed to stand and say “Mr. Chair, I rise to a parliamentary inquiry.”
The chair may reply or ask the Parliamentarian for an opinion.
BTW when you’re the Parliamentarian, you are not expected to know all the answers.
If you do not know you may ask an individual from the assembly to offer an opinion of which you may or may not take. The chairperson should not allow members to comment without being first recognized and then asked to stand.
In the situation where you believe that procedurally something is out of order you again rise without waiting to be recognized (and you may interrupt a speaker who has the floor) and say: Mr. or Madame Chairman I rise to a point of order. You do not need a seconder.
The chair is obliged by our procedural law (Robert’s Rules) to recognize you immediately and say “State your point of order.”
If the chair makes a decision that you disagree with or you feel offends the will of the assembly then it is your responsibility as a member to rise (again without being recognized) and state (loudly) “I appeal from the decision of the chair.” This appeal requires a seconder and the chair may choose to explain their decision but he or she is obligated to call for a vote of the assembly.
Chairpersons and executive groups and national leaders don’t make perfect decisions. They do the best they can. It is up to the rest of us to offer them our guidance. If we fail to do so, we have no right to complain when they attempt to fulfill their roles.
By the way, when challenged the chair may ask the assembly to comment and thereby start a debate.
The chair may also ask the Parliamentarian to give an opinion and when the Parliamentarian rises all debate must cease and all other members, which the exception of the chair, must be seated and be silent.
Okay so let’s say you’re asked to say a few words at your company’s annual meeting or your best friend’s wedding or your Toastmaster meeting.
The only problem is you forgot about it. (Sorry to tell you kids but this happens a lot when you get older. I carry a tape recorder around somedays.)
Here’s what I’ve done in the past:
- Write out the first line or two that tells the audience what you’re going to say;
- Write the topic line for two or three stories that illustrate your point;
- Write out your closing so you’re sure you hit it (If I’m going to screw anything up, it will be the big closing line);
- Walk confidently to the lectern, shake the presenter’s hand and put a BIG smile on your face;
- Read the first line, tell your stories, read your closing line (if necessary) and receive the applause.
What I don’t do regardless of what happens:
- I never apologize for anything or say I’m sorry:
- I never let anything distract me. (Once had the lights fail during a major talk at a conference. The mic still worked so I said: “Well I’ve never had this effect before.” Got a big laugh and lots of sympathy);
- If I forget where I am, I insert a dramatic pause (It’s sure dramatic to me.);
- If I really forget everything I stall by saying” “The next thing I say will be the most important part of my speech”*
- After the speech, I never admit to anything.
Do you have any tips for new (or more seasoned) members that you care to share on the blog?
* I’ve actually done this during a speech. Totally lost my train of thought and was in front of the lectern without my notes (which probably wouldn’t have helped me anyway) and stood there smiling like a mad man at the audience whose members kept leaning in to hear whatever gem it was I was going to impart. After what seemed like an eternity I figured out what to say and said it with great emphasis. The audience was enthralled. Marion was laughing her head off at the back of the room as she knows this is one of my ways of getting out of a bad situation.